Re: [entity-resolution] New XML Catalogs draft: 18 Oct 2002

[Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>]

At 10:43 2002 10 21 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>/ Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> was heard to say:
>| At 21:23 2002 10 18 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
>|>| 2) Should there be a customization layer for the DTD?
>|>| We didn't provide the hooks that we talk about in the normative specification. 
>|>| This would not be a change to the normative specification, but to make the 
>|>| non-normative DTD match up to the normative specification in a better way. 
>|>| Thus this is editorial; no objections to making the addition of 
>|>| <!ENTITY % local.catalog.class "">
>|>| to the DTD.
>|>|
>|>| The editor may add others as he sees fit when he considers this issue, on 
>|>| condition that he email the mailing list to allow for comments.
>|>
>|>Done.
>|
>| I gather these changes were not highlighted in the diff version.
>
>That's correct. It's an artifact of my auto-diff system. Hmm. I should
>rework that maybe. Anyway, it's just a few PEs.
>
>|>| 4) Norm raised the issue of system ID interpretation of being a pure URI. 
>|>| Suggestion to deprecate the system entry in version 1.1 and define lookup in 
>|>| terms of public + URI as well as public + system. Minimalist argument. Norm 
>|>| says that there was a SAX issue; action item to post something on it.
>|>
>|>I still need to post something. I encouraged Daniel Veillard to post his
>|>arguments. [ DV: please post your thoughts to the comments list. ]
>|
>| I gather nothing was done to the draft in this area.
>
>Right.


Okay, just checking.  The draft looks fine to me.

I note that this is now called a WD.  Is the plan to update the
Committee Draft to be this?

paul