Re: [entity-resolution] 1.1?

[Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>]

At 14:25 2003 10 02 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>I called the spec today V1.1 because there's no obvious provision for
>another draft without bumping the number. But there aren't any
>backwards incompatible changes, it's really just editorial
>clarification, I think.
>
>Suggestions welcome.

If there are no real changes, then it's not 1.1.
Maybe it's a Second Edition.  

If there are no obvious provisions for this, then
the process is broken.

paul