Re: [entity-resolution] suffix matching

["Lauren Wood" <lauren@textuality.com>]

Does anyone have any thoughts on this?

Lauren

On 13 Dec 2004 Lauren Wood wrote:

> Which will cause implementors the least heart-burn when it comes to 
> retrofitting their implementations? From the user perspective these 
> two ideas look equally easy to use.
> 
> Lauren
> 
> On 13 Dec 2004 Norman Walsh wrote:
> > | - in summary we should add it to the spec. Action on Norm to add this 
> > | to the spec.
> > 
> > Ok. How?
> > 
> >   <systemSuffix suffix="docbook.dtd" uri="full-path-to-docbook.dtd"/>
> > 
> > 
> >   Pro: separate element for separate functionality
> >   Con: functionality is similar to rewriteSystem. if we had planned
> >        this from the start, we might have called rewriteSystem
> >        'systemPrefix'
> > 
> > or
> > 
> >   <rewriteSystem systemIdEndString="docbook.dtd"
> >                  rewritePrefix="full-path"/>
> > 
> >   Pro: reuses rewriteSystem for similar functionality.
> >   Con: makes rewriteSystem more complex, adds attribute co-constraints
> >        (must have one of systemIdStartString/systemIdEndString, but not both)
> >        rewritePrefix works slightly differently in the two cases.
> > 
> > or
> > 
> >   ...something else...
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/entity-resolution/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>