OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

entity-resolution message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [entity-resolution] minutes from ER TC phone call 20050215


On 16 Feb 2005 Paul Grosso wrote:

> > From: Lauren Wood [mailto:lauren@textuality.com] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, 16 February, 2005 14:11
> > To: entity-resolution@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: RE: [entity-resolution] minutes from ER TC phone 
> > call 20050215
> > 
> > On 16 Feb 2005 Paul Grosso wrote:
> > > I'd like us to double check things.  I do not believe we need
> > > to certify that we're using a CD.  A CD is just put out for
> > > public review and needs no certification.
> > > 
> > > I may be confused with the changing status of names in OASIS,
> > > but this does not match what we're doing in the DITA TC, for
> > > example.
> > 
> > It's my interpretation of the stuff in 
> > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#standard
> > 
> > It starts with "A TC may recommend that the Committee Draft be made 
> > an OASIS Standard." and then switches language to say that what is 
> > submitted is "A formal specification" as well as "Certification by at 
> > least three OASIS member organizations that they are successfully 
> > using the specification" so from my reading, that means that the 
> > certification has to be applied to the CD that we will be submitting, 
> > i.e. the one that we just voted on but that is not yet on the site. 
> > Nowhere does it say that you can certify you're using a previous 
> > version of the CD, nor that some version other than the CD can be 
> > made into an OASIS Standard. The CD here is not just any draft ready 
> > for review, it's the formal Committee Draft as specified in 
> > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#committee_draft
> > (i.e., the one that used to be called Committee Specification).
> 
> So we're certifying the CD as part of the process of submitting 
> it to become and OASIS Standard?  Is that it?

Yes. In a sense we're jumping the gun since we have to go through 
public review first before formally applying for OASIS Standard vote, 
but I know that some companies take a long time to get these things 
ready, so I wanted to get the ball rolling for those companies (not 
Arbortext).

Lauren


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]