[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [fwsi-comment] Public Comment
Hi Brian Thanks for your comments on this. As the public review is now close, I would like to respond to this suggestion of yours. Sorry if it seemed an awfully long time ago. We have discussed and evaluated your suggestion of incorporating WS-Trust, and the TC is agreeable to your suggestion. As such the specs will now be changed to include this as well. Thank you for your suggestion. :-) On Behalf of the Functional Elements SC of FWSI TC -puaysiew- -----Original Message----- From: comment-form@oasis-open.org [mailto:comment-form@oasis-open.org] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 3:08 AM To: fwsi-comment@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [fwsi-comment] Public Comment Comment from: bcarroll@serena.com Name: Brian R. Carroll Title: Serena Fellow Organization: Seena Software Regarding Specification: Functional Elements Specification, Committee Draft 2.0 In section 2.5 Identity Management Functional Element, a choice of the SAML protocols (SAML Request and SAML Response) seems to have been made. While that is one viable option, the specification should also consider the use of WS-Trust. Ideally the two specs would converge, but in the meantime, the FWSI work would be more useful and applicable if it acknowledged the fact that two viable alternatives to perfrom the same functions existed. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fwsi-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: fwsi-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]