RE: [fwsi] Re: [soa-rm] JtC = cross post solution (was) ... Re: The real SOA challenge?

["Tan Puay Siew" <pstan@SIMTech.a-star.edu.sg>]

Hi All
I personally like the cross-TC idea that Jamie proposed.

Just a thought from FWSI point-of-view. In the FWSI work, we are more
concern with defining the needed functionalities for web services
applications. These applications are expected to be developed based on
the SOA paradigm. However, we have not and do not intend to articulate
any architecture in the specifications. As such, we would greatly
welcome any thought/mind-share on SOA or just service architectures.

Look forward to hear/see what Jamie has in mind in greater details

Rgds
-ps-


-----Original Message-----
From: John Hardin [mailto:john@maphin.net] 
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 6:45 AM
To: James Bryce Clark
Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org; fwsi@lists.oasis-open.org;
soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org; ebsoa@liasts.oasis-open.org;
semantic-ex@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [fwsi] Re: [soa-rm] JtC = cross post solution (was) ... Re: The
real SOA challenge?


I think this is a great idea. I'm looking forward to the conversation
Jamie.

James Bryce Clark wrote:
>     1.  Reply to Joe and John:  I hope so.
>     2.  Request to all:  This interesting but long thread is going on 
> in
> five e-mail lists.  These TCs have much in common, that properly is a 
> basis for further chat, but while maintaining the separate and 
> independent activities of each TC.  I would like to suggest a
solution.  
> It would take some duplicate traffic off these lists, and provide a 
> place for these cross-TC, SOA-oriented coordination conversations.
>     I suggest that these 5 TCs consider starting a "service
architecture 
> joint committee."  The rules of that OASIS structure can be found at 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#2.16.  It does not 
> require any surrender of each committee's own work plan or views, but 
> would provide a forum for discussion of possible voluntary 
> coordination.  I will take this up further with your committee chairs,

> and discuss what kind of charter/outline might work.  If the TCs (or 
> some subset of them) wish to do so, a JtC would create a place where 
> matters of joint interest can be more effectively discussed.
>     Regards  Jamie
> 
> ~   James Bryce Clark
> ~   Director, Standards Development, OASIS
> ~   jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
> 
> At 08:39 AM 11/17/2005, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> 
>>> From: John Hardin [mailto:john@maphin.net]
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:29 AM
>>> * * *
>>> We are working these three items into the next generation of the 
>>> OASIS Technical Architecture.
>>
>>
>> I believe you meant to say "ebXML Technical Architecture"? Joe
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|  john c hardin
|  Chief Technology Officer
|  http://www.maphin.net
|  606.598.7353 office
|  606.813.4316 cell
|  mailto:john@maphin.net
|
|  Chair - OASIS ebSOA Technical Committee
|  http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ebsoa
|
|
|  "The new electronic interdependence recreates the world in the
|   image of a global village."
|
|    Marshall McLuhan, "Gutenberg Galaxy", 1962
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~