Re: [geolang-comment] First proposals for ISO 639 and 3166 available

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

Steve Pepper scripsit:

> (2) One that declares the "language" and "language group/collection"
> topics and otherwise consists of a set of class-instance associations
> between the topics declared in (1) and the classes to which 639
> (rightly or wrongly) asserts that they belong (let's call this one
> 639-classes.xtm).

+1 for the reasons given

> Actually, the same line of argument (ease of use, the ability to get
> at just those parts of the formal representation that are actually needed
> for a particular application) could be used to justify splitting
> 639-basic.xtm into multiple topic maps. 

-1

-- 
John Cowan        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan          jcowan@reutershealth.com
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan