Re: [geolang-comment] First proposals for ISO 639 and 3166 available

[Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>]

* Murray Altheim
| 
| Understood. Thanks very much for the clarification, Steve. 

I'm glad Steve managed to clear this up in my absence. Since this now
appears to be settled I'll just skip over that subthread.

| This makes good sense to me. I don't see much to disagree with, and
| would probably side with the "warts and all" issue you mention.

Noted.
 
| While I realize you probably consider the XHTML, XTM and RDF files
| as separate entities, it seems like one of them could be used to
| generate the other two (eg., using perhaps XSLT), saving maintenance
| and potential errors.

I agree completely. I'm using the CSV files from the maintenance
agencies to generate all the output data (using Python). I was
wondering whether I ought to publish the source data and the
scripts. If anyone's interested I'll do so.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
ISO SC34/WG3, OASIS GeoLang TC        <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >