[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: HumanMarkup Reservations
> So I seem to be lost out here. Lost in a kind of "well, we'll charter a > group and work out what it does later" ambience... and somebody needs to > sort that out quick. Not IMHO; *really*. How do I get this through to > people? Perhaps it's just that I don't have the HumanML available yet to do > so :-) > How about... <serious level="98%>HumanML needs to do something quick!</serious> Ok, funny <humor level="60%"/>...but you are right in many ways <correct level="70%"/>. We are leveraging the work we've done at YahooGroups, and we've discussed a lot of theoretical, conceptual, and technical topics but real, practical applications haven't been fully outlined--we got as far as the HumanML_Write editor prototype, general list of possible apps, marked sentences with different colors and fonts (based on emotion and intensity), and several use-case diagrams. Before our first meeting, we will start out being very specific in these regards. As mentioned in my earlier post, a formal applications document will certainly be part of a pre-meeting HumanML deliverable. Ranjeeth Kumar Thunga HumanMarkup Chair rkthunga@humanmarkup.org (646) 456-9076 > As Manos has pointed out to me, I seem to be stuck on some odd sort of > "HumanML: emoticons; HumanML: emotions" thing, and it's bugging me. My rule > of thumb is that if I don't have an application of something running (or > runnable) on my desktop, then it's not useful. That's why I'm not too keen > on VRML. > > Of course, having said that, HumanML can't and won't be used in plain text, > any more than people are going to be writing chunks of XHTML. It's not > going to be used on IRC either; sorry, but real time HumanML isn't going to > happen unless the interface somewhat kicks-ass. > > What I'd like the group to focus on more is useful stuff like managing > collaborations, trust mechanisms, and the like. Of course, I'm coming at > this from the RDF angle, so I'm already thinking about trust on the > Semantic Web and so forth, but there is a great overlap between that and > HumanMarkup. Do I trust this person? How do I establish that trust? > > Another possible direction is a cultural database deeley, where you could > look up gestures and so forth, and be able to learn details about cultural > idioms; useful for business meetings and so forth. I probably wouldn't be > able to help with that, and it would have very little to do with HumanML, > but it would be useful all the same. > > Something else - that Kurt raised - would be establishing mappings from > SVG+metadata to text using XSLT or whatever. I'm not sure what that has to > do with "HumanMarkup", but then contrarywise, I'm not sure what > "HumanMarkup" has to do with anything, so we'd better bend the rules a > little bit. > > -- > Kindest Regards, > Sean B. Palmer > @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . > :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> . > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC