RE: [humanmarkup-comment] Item by item approach to Primary Base S chema

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

Suggest those who are not conversant with the basics of 
semiotics review some literature.  The Chandler papers 
online are a good start.  Otherwise, this review will 
not gel and will become as the last pass did, a fight 
over languages, schema types, and implementation details 
for particular systems.  If the differences say, between 
signs, symbols and signals aren't obvious, we'll have a 
hard time with this.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]

In order to stimulate debate and discussion, and to thoroughly ground 
us in the mechanics of a methodology that will, at the expense of 
some undeniable excess and unnecessary effort, put each and every 
element in our Base Primary Human Markup XML Schema into the record 
as having been openly discussed and decided upon, I am going to start 
next week a process of scrutinizing and approving this schema as is 
at least element item by element item.

I will also add a note with each item about where in succeeding 
secondary schemata I see each element being used.