RE: [humanmarkup-comment] Re: [topicmaps-comment] Re: on the Manhattan project for the Knowledge Sciences

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

Agreed, and now back to the work...

It will probably have to be tomorrow before I get back to channel and 
chronemic, both of which had roles in this thread.

Ciao,
Rex

At 11:06 AM -0500 6/3/02, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>There are lots of parallel efforts going on these days.  The
>question is always one of the tightness of coupling that requires
>assets and resources to be expended in maintaining the
>overlaps given the coupling.   HumanML *is* just a set of
>abstract topics.  The rest is in the applications.
>
>I enjoy Paul's posts.  I simply wish they were more targeted
>to assiting us in the current work on the draft products over
>recruiting people to join an organization working on its own
>IP.  I don't object to the IP; I don't have to time to help
>further that goal.
>
>len
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]
>
>I agree with most of what you say, Len, but I do think Paul's
>initiative can be a fruitful parallel effort, and since it is aimed
>at a five-year time frame, is likely to evolve over time, as these
>efforts always do.


--