Re: [humanmarkup-comment] modified HumanML taxonomy

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

I'm about to go into a telecon, but we don't have to do what Len 
suggests now. We can do it later, once we have a set of primaries. I 
suggested DAML-OIL as a starting pint in a separate post.

Rex

At 5:58 PM +0300 6/11/02, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) wrote:
>Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>
>>For David's modified taxonomy to work within the current design, 
>>the classes need to identify the primary, then derive what he has 
>>now from that.
>
>Does this mean we just use different terminology?
>
>
>Manos
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>


--