[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [humanmarkup-comment] PC1-Inclusions
Hi Everyone, I am excerpting a message I received the first day of the Public Comment Period from the chair of the Customer Information Quality TC (CIQ). "... It will be useful if you can explicitly state and refer to the schemas used from other groups/bodies in your specifications document as a separate section." To those of you who are familiar with the process we use for archiving our discussions automatically, you know the drill, and for those who are not familiar with process: Please reply to this message if you have comments, discussion, suggestions, etc. If you have comments, etc that range beyond it, please post those separately with a subject line of your choice. This particular issue is one I encountered as I compiled our schema and I solved it only in the schema itself and did not include any mention of it in the textual specification documents. I think it belongs in the Introduction. I am going to suggest to the appropriate OASIS committees/chairs/Technical Advisory Board that a formal method for inclusions of other standards be adopted. As it happens the CIQ schema namespaces are included in our schema for their extensible Name Language (xNL:2.0) and extensible Address Language (xAL:2.0). There are also other namespaces imported, but they are commented out for now because their namespace urns/locations are not finalized. Those are HR-XML and XNS. Ciao, Rex -- Rex Brooks Starbourne Communications Design 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA 94702 *510-849-2309 http://www.starbourne.com * rexb@starbourne.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC