[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [huml-comment] PC-33 -Section 4.4.6-race
cognite@zianet.com wrote: >Being non-objective as well as prejudicial, this term thus merits being >dropped from huml Physical Descriptor primaries and relegated to possible >user-developed secondaries, with a warning that its usage may entail >problems of vagueness and poor communication. > I also fail to see how the benefits of this term are enough to shadow the negative elements described above. Since this is supposed to be against misscommunication, we should be exploring more objective models that actually help in isolating the legacy terms one can abuse, at least when viable workarounds exist. I haven't been convinced that race can justify it's position in the primaries or the possible loss in case of it's omission from the primaries. I'm wondering about the opinion of lurkers in this and any issues around the primaries, i mean "hello people, this is the public comment period"... Kindest regards, Manos
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC