Re: TC Meeting Minutes 06-22-05

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

Thanks Sylvia,

Will do.

Ciao,
Rex

At 9:55 PM +0000 6/27/05, cognite@cognizor.com wrote:
>On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 07:38:53 -0700
>Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com> wrote:
>
>....
>
>-------
>
>Suggested revision of phrasing, adding more detail:
>
>CHANGE FROM THIS PARA:
>
>Sylvia reported that she had taken that work and updated it with a
>non-normative overview that goes beyond the work Rex had done in
>reorganizing it in a more comprehensive way to achieve a more unified
>conceptual approach.
>
>The primary base revision was necessitated, Rex reminded us,
>
>SUBSTITUTE THESE, THEN AFTER INSERT CONTINUE WITH MINUTES AS-IS:
>
>Sylvia offered her rewrite of the Primary Base Schema (which was available
>as v. 0.92 on the OASIS site in the Human Markup Language branch of
>Documents).  This work, dubbed v. 0.93a, was sent out email as reply to
>addressees of the meeting's agenda.  Hopefully this will get us to
>a more unified conceptual approach. 
>	More specifically, the re-write constitutes a re-framing of the
>approved huml term definitions to make them more systematic.  Informed
>particularly by the CIDOC in-practice museum artifact and library
>tags and by ontologies developed by logicians, the idea is to move further
>toward a primary base of XML tags for human markup that is [relatively]
>logically complete, coherent, and whose terms are at comparable levels
>of detail for expanding into application areas that take "humanness" into
>account. 
>	As such, in the re-write some of the forensic-detail terms were
>subsumed, logic foundation terms added, a concretized replacement term
>suggested for one that has been problematic. (The original can be derived
>from the new one as data accumulates if desired.)  Term
>sequence was re-organized so later terms build upon prior ones. 
>Specific suggestions for expanding from beyond a base term when 
>developing applications were added.  Old and new phrasing mix in the 
>definitions,
>but layout is almost the same so hopefully can be dropped directly into
>the XML-definition and OWL ontology (as well as RDF) definitions.
>
>
>-------
>last sentence ;)
>	attract more active members -> attract additional active members
>
>-------
>question
>
>	where on the OASIS site are
>	the presentations made in the last 2 years' Collaboration 
>Expedition Workshops?
>
>	the references/papers from the CIDOC presentation?
>
>	the infamous over-claim article, its critique, other such? 
>	Are they referenced?
>	What are the references?  Eventually we may need to cite and rebut.
>
>========
>SC


-- 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-849-2309