[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: OMG-HL7 Healthcare DTF/ Collaboration TF meeting in Burlingame on 3 February 2005.
From: | Harrington, David [SMTP:dharrington@medicalert.org] | ||
To: | 'healthcare@omg.org'; 'servicesbof@lists.hl7.org' | ||
Cc: | |||
Subject: | HDTF Meeting Notes | ||
Here are the notes from the OMG-HL7 Healthcare DTF/ Collaboration TF meeting in Burlingame on 3 February 2005.
David
Harrington |
i.
We need to
embrace and understand both the XML and the model in order to approach semantic
interoperability
ii.
Review of
the Concept Paper
iii.
There is a
perception in
iv.
Discussion
about whether OMG has a single definition of a
“platform”
v.
Alan
suggests that the term “computationally independent” replace
“platform”
i.
Should
include other standards like X.12
ii.
It is
important to Kaiser that the major healthcare software vendors be involved –
ideally as submitters – but at least as implementers. Write into
RFPs?
iii.
The
history of the RFP process in OMG is that if a vendor is not involved in the
drafting in the document, the process will fail
iv.
Suggestion
to produce a plan with dates and milestones that specifies critical success
factors for producing the first #N specifications, along with consequences of
not meeting the dates
Steps |
Products |
Who
|
Establish selection
criteria |
Service selection
criteria -
functional -
technical -
business |
|
Evaluate the list against
them |
|
|
Recruit
submitters |
|
|
Select and
prioritize |
Prioritized short
list |
|
Define format for the HL7 CIM
template |
HL7 CIM
template |
|
Establish CIM quality
criteria |
CIM quality
criteria |
|
Establish project
teams |
|
|
Produce the CIM (normal HL7
ballot process to occur post-pilot) -
assess governmental,
legislative, statutory and other external
drivers -
identify conformance
criteria |
[Balloted] CIM
spec -
conformance
profile |
|
OMG-HL7
Review |
|
|
Determines OMG RFP strategy for
HL7 CIM |
List of RFPs – RFP
scope |
|
Produce
RFPs |
RFP1, RFP2,
… |
|
Assess RFP against conformance
criteria -
include governmental,
legislative, statutory and other external
drivers |
|
|
Issue RFP consistent with OMG
process (normal OMG RFP process) |
LOI, responses/submissions,
etc. |
|
Evaluate initial
submissions |
|
|
Evaluate final
submissions |
|
|
Move to
adopt |
Recommendation for
adoption |
|
Process
assessment/feedback |
|
|
|
Static |
Dynamic | ||
|
(EHR Functional Model)
|
y |
|
y |
Information |
|
y |
(static
changes) |
y |
Computational
|
(EHR
Functional Model Infrastructure section) |
y |
|
|
Engineering |
|
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
|
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]