[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: IMI TC Minutes, March 19th 2009
|
1. Call to order/roll call Drummond
Reed Cordance* Michael
McIntosh IBM Anthony
Nadalin IBM Bruce
Rich IBM John
Bradley Individual Scott
Cantor Internet2 Marc
Goodner Microsoft Corporation Michael
Jones Microsoft Corporation Norman
Brickman Mitre Corporation* Mike
Kirkwood Polka Networks, Inc. Lost
voting status None Gained
voting status Norman
Brickman Mitre Corporation* 2.
Reading/Approving minutes from last meeting http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200903/msg00002.html Minutes
approved 3.
TC Logistics (10 minutes or less) 4.
Issues list -
Actions AI:
Chairs to request new issue list from TC admin Done,
new issue list is at: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/IMI Old
issue list needs to be cleaned up, e.g. all issues marked closed or pointing to
new issue list as appropriate. Old
issue list: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/imi/IssueList AI
Chairs to add link to home page to new issue list. -
Issues http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/IMI IMI
1.0 issues PR
comment to change RSA key to public key in section 3.3.5.2 http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/IMI-1 Editors
agree this is editorial Some
discussion that there are implications to the key size that aren’t
generic. Assigned
to Scott for proposing text PR
spec needs a 2119 review http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/IMI-2 Terms
in namespace table don’t need to be normative. Agree. Section
2.2, line 343, optional after MUST doesn’t seem normative. Suggest
deleting optional in that case. Need
time in TC for review. Validate
XML in spec is well formed http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/IMI-6
Need
to verify requirement is well formed vs. valid May
want to validate examples intended to show entire exchange. Assigned
to editors. IMI
TBD issues IMI
version next prerequisites http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/IMI-3 Namespace:
200903, combine with TC short name and OASIS policy http://docs.oasis-open.org/imi/ns/identity-200903 Version
number: 1.1 until we have something more than that. Discussion
about need for incorporating 1.0 content vs. just new content Editor’s
document for 1.1 discussion, place to hold decisions from v.next issue
resolutions etc. Should
not incorporate 1.0 content until 1.0 is done Public
review etc. wouldn’t start until after 1.0 approval complete Affirmative
statements with information cards http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/IMI-4 Sending
data from RP to IdP http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/IMI-5
Is
this the same issue as asking for 1 of n issuers? Agree
from our view point they are two separate issues John
to file this in our issue list Other
issues: Also,
how do you indicate multiple issuers without SP? Are there simpler alternatives
to SP? Middle ground may be an object tag that refers to SP doc without
requiring an STS. John
to file this issue as well. 5.
Other business None 6.
Adjournment |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]