OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

imi message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: work product review


The following issues have been identified in the submitted work products and must be corrected before they can be uploaded to docs.oasis-open.org and a public review announced:

SAML V2.0 Information Card Token Profile Version 1.0
1. Specification URIs:
This Version:
  The path includes 'ed'; I'm guessing this is intended to point to something akin to a Working Draft. Note that the TC Process clearly identifies the stages of a document as follows: working draft (wd), committee draft (cd), public review draft (pr), committee specification (cs), and OASIS standard (os). There is no such stage as 'ed'.

Previous Version:
  As this is the first time this document has been requested to be uploaded, it should state 'N/A'. the URIs specified in this section do not resolve (and won't, since we only upload approved documents to docs.oasis-open.org)

2. Namespaces:
This section has been removed from the cover page, but the following reference is given in 2.1:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/imi/ns/token/saml2/200908

Note that ns is reserved for OASIS namespaces, all of which must be identified on the cover page of a document and accompanied by a namespace document that corresponds to the template found at docs.oasis-open.org/templates

3. References:
WSTrust14 reference does not meet the OASIS citation link requirements
SAML1.1IMI reference does not conform to the OASIS citation format/link requirements.


------

SAML V1.1 Information Card Token Profile Version 1.0
1. Specification URIs:
This Version:
  The path includes 'ed'; I'm guessing this is intended to point to something akin to a Working Draft. Note that the TC Process clearly identifies the stages of a document as follows: working draft (wd), committee draft (cd), public review draft (pr), committee specification (cs), and OASIS standard (os). There is no such stage as 'ed'.

Previous Version:
  As this is the first time this document has been requested to be uploaded, it should state 'N/A'. the URIs specified in this section do not resolve (and won't, since we only upload approved documents to docs.oasis-open.org)

2. Namespaces:
This section has been removed from the cover page, but the following reference is given in 2.1:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/imi/ns/token/saml1_1/200912

Note that ns is reserved for OASIS namespaces, all of which must be identified on the cover page of a document and accompanied by a namespace document that corresponds to the template found at docs.oasis-open.org/templates

3. References
The references to OASIS TC documents do not conform to the OASIS citation format/link requirements.

4. Invalid URI:
In section 2.4.1 the following URI is given:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-saml-token-profile-1.1#SAMLV1.1

That is an invalid reference.



Please make the necessary corrections, re-approve the documents, and re-submit for public review.

Regards,

Mary

Mary P McRae
Director, Standards Development
Technical Committee Administrator
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
twitter: @fiberartisan  #oasisopen
phone: 1.603.232.9090

Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open.










[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]