[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [imi] work product review
Thanks for pointing these issues out. I’ll address them and send you updated docs.
-- Mike
From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org]
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 10:26 PM
To: imi@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [imi] work product review
The following issues have been identified in the submitted work products and must be corrected before they can be uploaded to docs.oasis-open.org and a public review announced:
SAML V2.0 Information Card Token Profile Version 1.0
1. Specification URIs:
This Version:
The path includes 'ed'; I'm guessing this is intended to point to something akin to a Working Draft. Note that the TC Process clearly identifies the stages of a document as follows: working draft (wd), committee draft (cd), public review draft (pr), committee specification (cs), and OASIS standard (os). There is no such stage as 'ed'.
Previous Version:
As this is the first time this document has been requested to be uploaded, it should state 'N/A'. the URIs specified in this section do not resolve (and won't, since we only upload approved documents to docs.oasis-open.org)
2. Namespaces:
This section has been removed from the cover page, but the following reference is given in 2.1:
Note that ns is reserved for OASIS namespaces, all of which must be identified on the cover page of a document and accompanied by a namespace document that corresponds to the template found at docs.oasis-open.org/templates
3. References:
WSTrust14 reference does not meet the OASIS citation link requirements
SAML1.1IMI reference does not conform to the OASIS citation format/link requirements.
------
SAML V1.1 Information Card Token Profile Version 1.0
1. Specification URIs:
This Version:
The path includes 'ed'; I'm guessing this is intended to point to something akin to a Working Draft. Note that the TC Process clearly identifies the stages of a document as follows: working draft (wd), committee draft (cd), public review draft (pr), committee specification (cs), and OASIS standard (os). There is no such stage as 'ed'.
Previous Version:
As this is the first time this document has been requested to be uploaded, it should state 'N/A'. the URIs specified in this section do not resolve (and won't, since we only upload approved documents to docs.oasis-open.org)
2. Namespaces:
This section has been removed from the cover page, but the following reference is given in 2.1:
Note that ns is reserved for OASIS namespaces, all of which must be identified on the cover page of a document and accompanied by a namespace document that corresponds to the template found at docs.oasis-open.org/templates
3. References
The references to OASIS TC documents do not conform to the OASIS citation format/link requirements.
4. Invalid URI:
In section 2.4.1 the following URI is given:
That is an invalid reference.
Please make the necessary corrections, re-approve the documents, and re-submit for public review.
Regards,
Mary
Mary P McRae
Director, Standards Development
Technical Committee Administrator
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
web: www.oasis-open.org
twitter: @fiberartisan #oasisopen
phone: 1.603.232.9090
Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]