[legalxml-courtfiling] RE: Court Policy

["Bergeron, Donald L. (LNG)" <Donald.Bergeron@lexisnexis.com>]

Great points. We will discuss them and likely add them to the requirements!

-----Original Message-----
From: Poindexter, Gary W [mailto:gpoindexter@kpmg.com]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:47 AM
To: Court Filing List; Court Filing TC Discusion List
Subject: Court Policy


John, et al:

Has there been any discussion around allowing specification of what
searches/inquiries are permitted/supported? It would be nice to know for
example:

1) Queries are supported or not. Possibly conditions (pre-registered users,
fee basis, etc.)
2) Queries are limited.. To specific elements such as: case #, case name,
prosecution, defense, status='disposed', document type, etc.
3) Provide a list of returned data (element list). This might include a
combination efiling elements and case elements. Or, a maybe only a case
summary is returned.

gary

-----Original Message-----
From: John M. Greacen [mailto:john@greacen.net]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Court Filing List; Court Filing TC Discusion List
Subject: Attachment


My apologies for leaving off this attachment to my previous note.

--
John M. Greacen
Greacen Associates, LLC.
18 Fairly Road
Santa Fe, NM  87507
505-471-0203

****************************************************************************
*
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. 

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
the governing KPMG client engagement letter.         
****************************************************************************
*