RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] [Fwd: ECF 1.1 spec testing status repo rtfrom King County, Washington]

[Tom.Clarke@courts.wa.gov]

The problem with ambiguous elements that Catherine discusses in several
places in her report reminds me of the comment by Dr. Leff in his ebXML
liaison report about the rest of the world using a "construction" approach
to element definition instead of our "restriction" approach.  Revising our
standards accordingly to use the construction approach should resolve some
of the existing implementation ambiguities and make the standards more
interoperable.

-----Original Message-----
From: John M. Greacen [mailto:john@greacen.net] 
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 6:16 AM
To: Court Filing List
Cc: Marty Halvorson
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] [Fwd: ECF 1.1 spec testing status report
from King County, Washington]

Here is a short but very helpful status report on the use of the 1.1
specification in King County.  Catherine and Roger have asked for
comments and suggestions on one issue they have encountered.  Does
anyone have any ideas for them?

--
John M. Greacen
Greacen Associates, LLC.
18 Fairly Road
Santa Fe, NM  87507
505-471-0203