[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] RE: Preliminary List of "Roles" in LegalProceedings
I think the list you have provided is fairly comprehensive in describing titles used in the various categories. Having a list of nouns used to designate officials and other actors (dare I say it?) in the law, safety, and justice system and providing that to GTRI is a helpful, important step.
Of course, the various titles are not precisely and exhaustively defined by the leading definition. Ultimately, to be useful in the Data Dictionary, terms all require defining. (At the Integrated Justice Technical Committee meeting, the GTRI consultants were very clear about their needing definitions supplied to them by subject matter experts.) While some terms are synonyms or not easily distinguished from one another because they reflect differences in local conventions (e.g., "judge," "circuit judge," "district judge"), the rest should be amenable to a more or less precise definition. Further, some of the distinctions (e.g., between "fact witness [plaintiff]" and "expert witness [defendant]") may not apply generally (i.e., many courts might call these "expert witnesses" or just "witnesses").
Would it be productive to put out a call for candidate definitions for these terms? I say "candidate" definitions, because they would have to be reviewed, reconciled, and so forth, to get to the precise and exhaustive definitions (or as close to that as possible) each of them should have. Also, synonymous terms need to be identified under a common definition. An alternative to asking everyone to help by a certain deadline might be to recruit a definitions work group, but such a group might best do the reconciling, etc., rather than having to come up with the candidate definitions on their own. I think casting a wide net to ask for candidate definitions could help us move forward in a very useful way.
Those are my 2-cents.
Regards,
Roger
Roger Winters Electronic Court Records Manager King County 516 Third Avenue, E-609 MS: KCC-JA-0609 Seattle, Washington 98104 V: (206) 296-7838 F: (206) 296-0906 roger.winters@metrokc.gov
-----Original Message-----
At the TC meeting at MIT in Boston last month, John Greacen and I agreed to come up with a list of specific "roles" commonly filled by various participants in a formal legal proceeding. We want to provide the list to GTRI from the TC in connection with the GTRI work on a Justice XML Data Dictionary.
This is a preliminary list of proposed general categories of participants in a legal proceeding and of specific "roles" within those general categories. I have not given John a chance to review this preliminary list in advance, so criticisms, questions, etc. should be directed to me. Each category description identifies the primary context of the role (its relationship to something else involved in a legal proceeding) in parentheses and includes a brief definition of the "role".
This preliminary list is simply to get the ball rolling. I've no doubt missed some roles. John and I both will welcome further postings and suggestions regarding additional "roles" to add to this list.
Rolly Chambers
List of specific roles of actors/participants in a legal proceeding:
-
judicialOfficer (of a court) - a person appointed to decide or administer a
case in a court
-
administrativeOfficer (of an agency) - a person in an agency appointed to
decide a case
-
attorney (for a party) - a person authorized to represent a party in a case
-
enforcementOfficer (of a law enforcement agency) - a person appointed as a law
enforcement officer
-
party (in a case) - a person, organization, or In Rem "thing" that is
a party in a case
- victim (of a crime or incident) - a person or organization that is a victim of a crime or incident |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC