RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Fw: Layered Interoperability SOW

[jkeane <jik@jkeane.com>]

Title: FW: Layered Interoperability SOW

If this requires a vote, I cast mine in favor... 

 

 

James I. Keane

JKeane.Law.Pro

20 Esworthy Terrace

North Potomac MD 20878

301-948-4062 F: 301-947-1176 (N.B.: NEW FAX NUMBER)

www.jkeane.com 

 

Co-Author and Annual Update Editor of Treatise: Litigation Support Systems, An Attorney Guide 2nd  Ed. (WestGroup, 1992, updated through 2002)

-----Original Message-----
From: Dallas Powell [mailto:dpowell@tybera.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 1:54 PM
To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Fw: Layered Interoperability SOW

Catherine asked me to post this message regarding the Layered Interoperability SOW to the list due to the situation described below.

 

Dallas

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Krause, Catherine

To: Dallas Powell

Cc: Krause, Catherine ; Winters, Roger ; John Greacen (john@greacen.net)

Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 10:42 AM

Subject: FW: Layered Interoperability SOW

Dallas:

I am sending this to you directly, since Roger and I currently have an issue where the new OASIS software is not allowing us to post messages to the list because our domain name for our e-mail is different than our state AOC, under which we have our membership.  Roger has asked Dr. Leff to look into this for us (and on behalf of the entire TC in case others have the same issue), and we have a contingency plan where we will use AOC-issued e-mail addresses for this purpose, but in the interim could you forward this to the entire list on my behalf?

Thanks,

Catherine

____________________

A few minor corrections are needed in the document:
 
- Under "proposed author(s) of the work, Roger Winters and I are listed as having experience implementing Electronic Court Filing 1.0.  The attempted implementation we were involved in was for Court Filing 1.1.

- It might be misleading to state we are "experienced in implementing" -- perhaps it would be better to state that we "participated in an attempt to implement" or something like that.  The ECF 1.1-based system delivered to us by a vendor was not accepted by us, so it was never implemented into a production environment.  We own the Requirements and Design documents on which that system was based, but we do not own or have access to the code, since we didn't accept the system.

Otherwise, the SOW looks great.  I do not feel these minor edits should hold up approval of the SOW by the TC.
 
 
Catherine Krause
E-Filing Project Manager
King County Department of Judicial Administration
(206)296-7860
catherine.krause@metrokc.gov <mailto:catherine.krause@metrokc.gov>
 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Greacen [mailto:john@greacen.net]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 1:35 PM
To: 'Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee'
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] 3-21 deadline for comments on Layered Interoperability SOW

I attach Dallas' proposed Statement of Work for the Layered Interoperability Subcommittee.  Please post your comments to the list by 3-21.  If no negative comments or proposed revisions are received by that date, the SOW will be approved.

John M. Greacen

Greacen Associates, LLC

HCR 78, Box 23

Regina, New Mexico 87046

505-289-2164

505-780-1450 (cell)