[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Agenda for Tuesday conference call and subcommittee report
Here are the details for Tuesday’s conference call. I hope that all voting members are able to participate.
Leader's Name: John Greacen Day/Date: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 Time of call: 1:00 to 2:00 pm Eastern time Conference Dial-in: 512-225-3050 Conference Guest Code: 84759# Number of lines needed: Anticipated Total = 40 Duration of the call: 1 Hour Leader's Phone Number: 505-780-1450
I attach the report of the subcommittee of Tom Clarke, Shane Durham, Eric Tingom and me that reviewed the comments submitted on the requirements document. The report includes new introductory material for the requirements document. It identifies specific items for further discussion by the TC during this conference call. And it gives a specific response to each comment submitted.
The agenda for the conference call will include the following items and any additional items raised by persons who submitted comments who are not satisfied with the subcommittee’s response.
Agenda
Subcommittee comment – Don’s suggested change would prohibit the attachment of an XML instance as a document in the payload. We do not believe that is the TC’s desire. We merely want to make clear that Court Filing Blue will not support accessing tagged material contained in an XML instance in the payload.
Subcommittee comment – Most courts merely remove sealed or inaccessible information from a response without providing any notification or explanation to the requester. Providing notice of the exclusion of information may disclose its existence, in contravention of the sealing or exclusion policy. The subcommittee recommends only that the court set forth in its court policies a disclosure of its general practice to exclude sealed and inaccessible information from the information returned in response to a query.
Subcommittee comment – The “Get Document” query was approved in Salt Lake City. We believe it is necessary.
Subcommittee comment – We believe that this is resolved by allowing the filer to opt out of the calculate fees query, but we believe the TC should decide.
Subcommittee comment – It is clear that MDEs need to know each other’s addresses. But whether that requires a formal process and, if so, what that process should be, needs to be resolved by the TC.
John M. Greacen Greacen Associates, LLC HCR 78, Box 23 Regina, New Mexico 87046 505-289-2164 505-289-2163 (fax) 505-780-1450 (cell)
|
Report of comments subcommittee4-16-05.doc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]