[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] New Proposed Service Models for ECF3
Dallas,
Here is a revision that I think solves the issues you
identified. I think we still need the query in Model B so that eService A
can decide to serve something that will not be part of the court
record. By separating out the MDE that responds to the query (I called it
the "eService Registry") and the central MDE that serves the other participants,
I think it aligns the two models.
jim
From: Dallas Powell [mailto:dpowell@tybera.com] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 5:28 PM To: 'Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee' Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] New Proposed Service Models for ECF3 Here is what I think we said today regarding the
eService. As I wrote the document I found several issues that need to be
addressed.
Dallas
|
Secondary Service V2 - jec.doc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]