[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: ECF Schema Related Question
Joe Mierwa noticed a discrepancy in the number of lead documents allowed between the CoreFilingMessage and RecordDocketingMessage. I think this is worth a discussion for ECF 4.1. Jim Cabral Helping our clients make a difference in the lives of the people they serve. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. From: James E Cabral
Joe, This question really tests my memory. Reviewing the ECF 3.x and 4.x schemas, I verified that we have allowed multiple lead and connected documents in CoreFilingMessage all the way back to ECF 3.0. In ECF 3.x,
RecordDocketingMessage allowed for multiple “reviewed” documents without distinguishing lead from connected documents. In ECF 4.0 and later, however, we changed ReviewDocketingMessage to allow one lead and multiple connected documents. Why exactly we didn’t
allow multiple leads in ECF 4.0, I can’t say for sure. For now, I think your analysis is correct – you would need to call ReviewDocketingMessage multiple times in the case of a CoreFilingMessage with multiple lead documents. But I think it is worth discussion
with the TC as to whether that makes sense for ECF 4.1 and beyond. Jim Cabral Helping our clients make a difference in the lives of the people they serve. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. From: Joe Mierwa
[mailto:Joe.Mierwa@urlintegration.com]
Hey, I only just noticed/realized that the CoreFilingMessage allows for multiple lead documents while the RecordDocketingMessage only allows 1 lead document. The net effect is that the Filing Review MDE would need to invoke the Court Record
MDE once per lead document. Is that correct? If so, I would assume that the rationale is that if the clerk is reviewing each lead as a separate package then each would be approved singly resulting into a filing into the court record.
Does that sound about right?
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in
error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]