RE: Example Container

[Greg Zarkis <gzarkis@imagesoftinc.com>]

I’m a bit late to the party here, but I recall during the most recent call there was a call for volunteers to assist with looking at the most recent WSDL. I have some bandwidth now and would love to be included in this process. Please let me know if I can help.

 

Thanks!

-Greg

 

From: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of James E Cabral
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 12:12 PM
To: Price, Jim <JPrice@courts.az.gov>; legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [faked-from] [legalxml-courtfiling] RE: Example Container
Importance: Low

 

Those are the root-level elements today in ECF 4.01.  We will need containers for all of the ECF 5.0 messages.

 

__
Jim Cabral
502 509-4532

 

From: Price, Jim
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 8:53 AM
To: James E Cabral; legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: Example Container

 

Jim C,

 

If I understand your email correctly, wouldn’t root-level containers be the RvFR (CoreFilingMessage, PaymentMessage) and RFR (CoreFilingMessage, PaymentMessage, RecordDocketingMessage)?

 

Thanks,

 

Jim P

 

From: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of James E Cabral
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 6:39 AM
To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Example Container

 

During the TC call yesterday, we agreed in principle on the need for a root-level container for most/all ECF messages so that we can include more than one payload in a single message. Elysa Jones reminded me that EDXL has something similar.  I’m not sure we want to adopt the EDXL Distribution Element itself but it seems like a useful model for us to consider.

 

http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-de/v1.0/EDXL-DE_Spec_v1.0.pdf

 

__
Jim Cabral
502 509-4532