[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Groups - ECF 5.0 Scheduling / WS-Calendar uploaded
|
I thought that the data pass through for various case types has been in the specification for quite a while? - Jim M From: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Dallas Powell Jim, Another area of pass through is for criminal charge updates so that a prosecuting attorney can see the existing charges, add, edit, remove, and then pass them back for updates. From our experience it is of value
to have the pass through. Dallas From:
legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of James E Cabral Thanks to Jim McMillan (and Dallas Powell?) for this proposal. I have a related question for discussion by the TC tomorrow: The pattern of “pass-through” queries from the Filing Assembly MDE through the Filing Review MDE to the Court Record MDE is something that isn’t addressed in the current ECF specifications but it is something I’ve seen in some real-world
implementations of ECF. Is this something we want o specifically allow or disallow in ECF 5? __ From: James McMillan
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]