We were not looking at the sample on this item, but we were looking at the schemas. Sounds like we misread - we will retrace and confirm. Thanks.
Philip Baughman
Senior Software Engineering Manager, eSolutions
P: 972.713.3770 ext: 113406
From: James E Cabral [mailto:jec@mtgmc.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 5:20 PM
To: Baughman, Philip <Philip.Baughman@tylertech.com>; legalxml-courtfiling (legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org) <legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: RE: One more item of feedback for working draft 22
Philip.
The stampinformationcallback message and current example includes nc:Case. What are we missing?
__
Jim Cabral
502 509-4532
From: Baughman, Philip
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 4:26 PM
To: legalxml-courtfiling (legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org)
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] One more item of feedback for working draft 22
All, good call today – thanks for your efforts in reviewing our feedback. At this time, we just have one more topic:
The stampinformationcallback.xsd does not seem to provide information it was intended to provide. Namely, case assignment information whereby a stamp could be produced. We propose that it include an nc:case.
Philip Baughman
Senior Software Engineering Manager, eSolutions
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
P: 972.713.3770 ext: 113406
www.tylertech.com
