The comment received from Joe Mierwa was:
I think that all example messages except for serve filing should *not* have ecf:ElectronicServiceInformation at the top of the message.
The Disposition reads:
Change the mapping and schema to remove ecf:ElectronicServiceInformation from request and response messages.
Tyler’s Position:
We see no harm in having ecf:ElectronicServiceInformation present for both ServeFiling and ReviewFiling. In fact, we actually leverage its presence. That is, our solution has three possible business scenarios:
- eFiling only
- eFiling plus eService
- eService only
#1 and #2 are currently implemented via the ReviewFiling operation in our ECF 4.01 certified version solution, whereas #3 is implemented via the ServeFiling operation. Our preference is to maintain that design as it is more efficient (one
call instead of two in scenario #2) as well as less complex (no need to associate two separate calls either implicitly or explicitly).
Philip Baughman
Senior Software Engineering Manager, eSolutions
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
P: 972.713.3770 ext: 113406
www.tylertech.com
