RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Requirements - XML and the contract

["John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com>]

Plz note that the latest working draft drops all the offensive material about
"social meaning" that is the subject of the first link below. That said, the
first link still contains some good information -- just ignore the broadside
about the drivel in the previous draft. Thanks Eddie!
Thanks,
John

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eddie O'Brien [mailto:eddie@ringtailsolutions.com]
>Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:54 AM
>To: 'Legalxml-Econtracts TC'
>Subject: RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Requirements - XML and the contract
>
>
>For those of you who care about the RDF issue (like me) here are a few
>references to stimulate thought.
>
>http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/03/05/social.html The Social Meaning of RDF
>http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/ RDF/XML Syntax Specification
>(Revised) - W3C Working Draft 10 October 2003 - hot off the presses
>http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/05/21/RDFNet Tongue in cheek T
>Bray
>
>For those of you who don't delete the email. :)
>
>Cordially,
>
>Eddie