Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Time for some closure on structural markup issues

["jmessing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com>]

What is simple v. gram?

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Daniel J. Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu>
Reply-To: dang@mit.edu
Date:  Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:37:30 -0800 (PST)

>Dear TC Members:
>
>I think it is time to come to closure on where we
>intend to go with the structural markup.  There has
>been some very good, helpful and high quality
>discussion on the issues.  We're at the point of
>deminishing returns on discussion now.   
>
>For example, I can see both sides to this one (simple
>vs gram) and am less concerned with where we come out
>than with coming to closure that we (as in we who are
>still left standing) can accept and would adopt.  I
>would be happy doing a simple model based on the art
>of the possible today, with an eye toward migration
>down the road, and I'd also be happy going further and
>fixing some of the issues now (more granular uses,
>better conversions, etc) with gram model and being
>more best practice oriented - if there is agreement
>behind that.  I feel I could easily justify either
>approach, could explain it and teach it to clients and
>during road shows (conferences, seminars, etc).  So -
>please - let us seek some closure during todays call. 
>I believe there is a need to close the structural
>issues now and conclude whatever our best guess is at
>this time.  
>
>Looking forward to chatting with you all, and moving
>to the next steps on this standard together.
>
> - Dan Greenwood
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-econtracts/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>