[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [legalxml-intercept] FWD: hardware legal intercept from Cisco
At 04:07 PM 4/22/2003, jmessing wrote: >http://news.com.com/2010-1071-997528.html Hi John, Declan's multiple articles on the Cisco TapMIB implementation is making the rounds. It's worth noting there are multiple inaccuracies - perhaps the most significant of which relates to the granularity of the interceptions. A specific communication can in fact be extracted. What's rather unfair here is that Cisco is being singled out. There are multiple other vendors, including Cisco's competitors, that have similar capabilities. These capabilities are also not optional. They are mandated by law in almost every jurisdiction worldwide. On the positive side, it is this LI-XML TC that is providing some of the key specifications that relate to accountability. Cisco is not in that business. cheers, tony
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]