[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [mgmtprotocol] Requirements
Some more: - The specification needs to be completely agnostic to any specific CIM schema / model. That means any future schema / model would need to be supported automatically. - We should do the specification in such a way that any code that implements the specification can be as schema/model agnostic as possible. I have serious doubts whether we achieve this. If it turns out I am right here, we will need to talk about tooling at some point that generates model dependent code. We probably would not want to dig too deeply into this, but what I want to make sure is that we are aware of such issues and "ground" our decisions by taking them into account to the extent needed. - We will need to support future versions of the CIM operations. Example (not entirely out of the air because I have a CR pending on that): The Associators operation gets an additional argument specifying a query string to be applied to the target side objects. I suspect there are changes to CIM operations that require new versions of our specification. This again brings up the question how versions of our spec are synchronized with versions of CIM operations specs. Probably some procedural mechanism needs to be established. Andy Andreas R. Maier IBM Senior Technical Staff Member, eServer Software Design IBM Lab Boeblingen, maiera@de.ibm.com, Phone +49-7031-16-3654
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC