[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Comment: Proposed Charter for OASIS Web Services Federation (WSFED)TC
Comments on the draft TC charter submitted [1] to establish the WSFED TC: 1) In the "General Notes on Scope" section it says: "If any of the above specifications is outside of a standardization process at the time this TC moves to ratify its deliverables, or is not far enough along in the standardization process, any normative references to it in the TC output will be expressed in an abstract manner, and the incarnation will be left at that time as an exercise in interoperability." It is not clear what 'far enough along in the standardization process' means. Does that mean a CD, CS or OASIS Standard, if the specification is being standardized in OASIS? Does that mean LC, CR, PR or Rec if the specification is being standardized in W3C? This should be explicitly stated in the charter. 2) We believe that OASIS Standards should have a high bar for normative references. Increasingly, OASIS Standards are being referenced and used by de jure standards organizations, which have strict rules with regard to normative references, as well as governments, profiling organizations such as WS-I and other standards bodies. Regardless of the disposition of comment #1 above for CS-level specifications, we believe that OASIS Standards should have only normative references to final, adopted specifications. 3) We also agree with the comments at [2]. Thanks and Regards. -Anish Karmarkar Oracle -- [1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/members/200703/msg00018.html [2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oasis-charter-discuss/200703/msg00007.html
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]