[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Topic: Schema - place and language (changed from minutes comment)
Hi Ralf, Am 07.09.12 10:52, schrieb Handl, Ralf:
...Looking at our SVN repository I see mainly plural names: starting with the SVN conventions /branches and /tags, continuing with /trunk/fingerprints, /trunk/minutes, /trunk/proposals, /trunk/tools, so /trunk/spec/schemas fits in nicely. In fact the only exception is /trunk/spec, so maybe we should rename it to /trunk/specs J I’d like to keep the folder tree as shallow (or fordable) as possible, so I’d prefer /xsd over /schema/xsd (and still prefer /schemas over /xsd J). @All: opinions? ...
no problem with SVN folder names. I had more the packaging target and subsequent URL for client XMLs in mind.
I also left the minutes untouched, since /trunk/schemas nicely qualifies as a "schema subfolder" as minuted from the discussion.
Onto something completely different: As we do not seem to be able to come up with a normative schema for CSDL, might we enhance the situation, in adding a more capable schema language, where all scenarios might be supported/validated against, thus describing CSDL normatively? What about RELAX NG, or schematron?
@All: opinions? Shall we investigate? What were the corner cases, that show the "unexpressible parts" of a schema attempt formulated in the W§C Schema Language?
All the best, Stefan.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]