[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [odata] [OASIS Issue Tracker] (ODATA-1617) Is ODATA-1472 an erratum or a new feature?
Hi, I view the resolution as a clarification, not a new feature. A further clarification on this issue is that it deals with allowed values. For example, at 1948:
<p>A successful <code>PATCH</code> request to the edit URL for a complex typed property updates that
George
Internal Use - Confidential From: odata@lists.oasis-open.org <odata@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of OASIS Issues Tracker Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 8:17 AM To: odata@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [odata] [OASIS Issue Tracker] (ODATA-1617) Is ODATA-1472 an erratum or a new feature? [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Heiko Theissen created ODATA-1617: ------------------------------------- Summary: Is ODATA-1472 an erratum or a new feature? Key: ODATA-1617 URL:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ODATA-1617__;!!LpKI!iWYVpUde0e4tkWlRyMYxjUmWkRBxCbJwaJ0TgOUb64XM2h9g4zTOCKwzCtr_7oK5EekQeN2GZWN-LrZHs6AIQD357JT1FK8CgBvaVQ$ [issues[.]oasis-open[.]org] Project: OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) TC Issue Type: New Feature Components: Protocol Affects Versions: V4.01_ERRATA01 Reporter: Heiko Theissen ODATA-1472 was closed as part of V4.01_ERRATA01. But isn't it really a new feature, which * belongs to V4.02 * must be mentioned in "Changes from Earlier Versions" * should be annotated with a Capabilities annotation? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.3#803004) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]