Re: [odf-adoption] Recap of ODF Camp for OASIS News

[Louis Suarez-Potts <Louis.Suarez-Potts@Sun.COM>]

Hi

On 2007-10-02, at 09:52 , Carol Geyer wrote:

> Peter,
> This is a big help, thanks.
>
> Would you or someone else from the TC post this ODF Camp recap on  
> OpenDocument
> XML.org?
>
> Should we create a Forum on opendocument.xml.org to discuss the
> interoperability issues that were identified at ODF Camp? We have a  
> Forum for
> "Positioning, Benefits, Compatibility, and Interoperability"
> http://opendocument.xml.org/positioning-forum -- but that seems a  
> bit broad.
>
> --c
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: peter.vandenabeele.be@gmail.com  
> [mailto:peter.vandenabeele.be@gmail.com]
> On Behalf Of Peter Vandenabeele
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 5:27 AM
> To: Carol Geyer
> Cc: odf-adoption@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [odf-adoption] Recap of ODF Camp for OASIS News
>
> On 10/1/07, Carol Geyer <carol.geyer@oasis-open.org> wrote:
>> Can someone send me 2-3 sentences on the ODF Camp that I can use in
> tomorrow's
>> OASIS News?
>
> I did not see any other contribution ? (Maybe in private)
>
> A possible text could be:
>
>   ODF Camp was held parallel to the OpenOffice.org 2007 conference in
>   Barcelona on 20 September 2007 with about 30 participants.  
> Interoperability
>   of ODF documents

Was it the documents that were being tested for interoperability or  
the applications? eg, Interoperability among ODF applications...

> was tested with documents generated in
>   StarOffice/OpenOffice.org, IBM Symphony, Google Docs, KOffice,
>   MS Office 2003 + Sun plug-in, MS Office 2003 + odf-converter and
>   SEPT-solutions Mobile Office. Different levels of  
> interoperability problems
>   where discovered (user errors (e.g. using spaces), technical  
> problems
>   (application bugs), interop problems with applications that have  
> a different
>   native format (e.g. frames-in-frames in MS Office), conceptual  
> problems of
>   document representation (e.g. how to represent bi-language  
> documents)).
>   The discussion will be followed-up online by the participants.
>
> I hope I did not forget any contribution ? Any other feedback on this
> proposed text ?

Thanks
louis
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter Vandenabeele
>