[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] ODF TC accessibility summary from meeting earlier today
On 15/06/06, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@sun.com> wrote: > I see to two issues with the above proposal: > > 1. The OpenDocument specification in section 9.3 states > > "In general, an application must not render more than one of the content > elements contained in a frame." > > This means, an application would either render the image, or the caption, but > it would not render both. An example of prior art? http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/imageobject.html <mediaobject> <imageobject> <imagedata fileref="figures/eiffeltower.eps" format="EPS"/> </imageobject> <imageobject> <imagedata fileref="figures/eiffeltower.png" format="PNG"/> </imageobject> <textobject> <phrase>The Eiffel Tower</phrase> </textobject> <caption> <para>Designed by Gustave Eiffel in 1889, The Eiffel Tower is one of the most widely recognized buildings in the world. </para> </caption> </mediaobject> Many media have both an image and a brief narrative for context provision? What is the rationale for this restriction please? > > 2. The caption element does not contain any information where the caption > will be rendered (above the frame, or below, which width will it have, etc.). > Actually, this would also be the case if the caption element would be > contained in the image element. If presentational information is to be contained within the source xml rather than a styling preference, yes a location attribute would provide this. I can't provide a source level example, but for a styling based customisation see http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/Captions.html HTH -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]