Re: [office-accessibility] How is 1.1 better for accessibility.

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 20/10/06, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg

> > Any clear statement from TC or this group?
> > Could we generate one?
>
> Appendix G.4 should contaiin what you are looking for.

Thanks Michael. See what he says.
It's almost a diff list, the guy enquiring is non technical
and I'm sure others might appreciate a 'sales' oriented statement
for accessibility.

regards



-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk