[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] Fw: Edited Draft of ODF Accessibility Guidelines
Some comments on Mak's comments.
I believe the wording Mak suggests is a good idea in order to address a broader audience.
Section 1.2.2.3 - It is a caret and not a cursor. On most systems the cursor is the mouse pointer.
Section 1.2.2.4 -
People with minor physical impairments have a variety of issues that prevent them from using the full keyboard or mouse easily. In order to support such users, complete ODF application usage and document manipulation should be possible ?? user friendly ?? without using the mouse.
Suggested rewording to reflect WCAG 2.0:
People with minor physical impairments have a variety of issues that prevent them from using the full keyboard or mouse easily. In order to support such users, all functionality of the content is operable in a non-time-dependent manner through a keyboard interface, except where the task requires analog, time-dependent input.
Section 1.2.2.5
Suggest rewording: Advanced on-screen keyboard software can actually extract the menu structure of the ODF application, the toolbar elements, and even the 'manipulable user?? user friendly?? interface elements' and place them on the software “keyboard” where the user can choose them.
To: Advanced on-screen keyboard software can actually provide remote access to accessible menus, toolbar elements, and other UI componentry on the software “keyboard” where the user can choose them.
I don't understand what Mak means by ?? “randomly” can be an appropriate word??
Section 1.2.2.6
Here is a reference for ASR: http://www.netac.rit.edu/publication/asr.html
Section 2.1
Common keystrokes Windows XP: http://www.rnib.org.uk/xpedio/groups/public/documents/PublicWebsite/public_rnib003585.hcsp
common keystrokes Macintosh: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=75459
There should be one on the Gnome site - Can't find it.
Section 2.3
Ineroperaability is a commonly used term.
Author of this section should fill in the API piece.
This bug showed up again in open office 3.2.5 A few examples
Section 4.2.2
Figure X Visual Rendering of an ODF list
Section 4.2.3
The standard landmark of contentinfo - Do not accept Mak's deletion of info as it is incorrect.
Section 4.2.4
Addressing Mak's comment about meta data. No additional meta data is required as the element presentation:notes constitutes the landmark
Mak introduces a Section 5.3.x but there is not section 5.3
5.3.1 Soft Page Breaks and Hard Page Numbering
Rich Schwerdtfeger
Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer
Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
12/07/2006 11:21 AM |
|
12/06/2006 07:26 PM
|
|
There will be no ODF accessibility subcommittee meeting tomorrow. I have not received a document from Mak. and we are waiting on a 1.2 draft.
Mike, any news on the edited draft?
Rich Schwerdtfeger
Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer(See attached file: ODF_Accessibility_Guidelines_mak_rev_30 Nov_06.odt)(See attached file: ODF_Accessibility_Guidelines_mak_rev_30 Nov_06.odt)
ODF_Accessibility_Guidelines_mak_rev_30 Nov_06.odt
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]