[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] Q: Alternative text for drawing objects
Thanks for clarification :) Malte. Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote, On 12/17/06 14:59: > > Hi Malte, > > The TC deemed that the use of draw:name has already been determined in > that it really is a unique id (like an xml id) vs. alternative text. > > Title is a short name that is mapped to the accessibleName propertery > and the title is mapped to the accessibleDescription as a long > description. So, we have a complete accessibility API mapping. Yes, > the title should be unique but not for the same reasons. > > Cheers, > > Rich > > > Rich Schwerdtfeger > Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist > Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board > blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer > > > *Malte Timmermann <Malte.Timmermann@Sun.COM>* > Sent by: Malte.Timmermann@Sun.COM > > 11/30/2006 04:49 AM > > > To > office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org > cc > > Subject > Re: [office-accessibility] Q: Alternative text for drawing objects > > > > > > > > > > Mmmh, nobody remembers? > > I need that answer, because people want to start implementation, but ask > for the difference. > > I am talking about the recommendation "Alternative text for non-text > objects", where we recommended to add <svg:title> and <svg:desc>, while > already having <draw:name>. > > What's the difference between name and title? > > Is it because of a draw name must be unique, while title == accessible > name doesn't have to be unique? > > Thanks, > Malte. > > Malte Timmermann wrote: > > Sorry, but I can't remember... > > > > Why did we introduce <svg:title> in addition to <draw:name>? > > > > Thanks, > > Malte. > > > > PS: I probably can't attend tomorrow, or maybe only the seconds half., > > sorry. > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]