[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] ODF Accessibility SC meeting
On 21/02/07, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Regarging our guidelines, what is left is to review Suann Nichols comments. > I know that at least Peter, Janina, and I believe the requirement to > duplicate the ATAG format should not be done at this time. We could consider > it for ODF 1.2. I am not sure what others think but I threw that out for > people to consider if we in fact prefer an ATAG format. Unless we have format complaints, I see no reason to follow ATAG. > > If someone is willing to review Suann's comments outside those that are > ATAG reforming related I would greatly appreciated. I'll take a look today Rich (instead of phoning!) regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]