Re: [office-collab] CT and Spreadsheet tables

[Thorsten Behrens <tbehrens@novell.com>]

robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
> I don't think any of the two proposals are necessary incorrect.  It comes 
> down to a question: Where do you put the intelligence in the system?  Do 
> you assume intelligent writers who produce documents that have the change 
> tracking state recorded in detail and then are processable generically by 
> relatively simple readers?
>
Hi Rob,

um, unless the reader processes the generic ct information on the xml 
level, it's not gonna be simple at all. So we're talking about a
rather constrained subset of readers here.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten

PGP signature