RE: [office-collab] Straw Poll re delay to consensus report to include MCT

["Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>]

Svante, this is too much like a drive-by shooting.  

I suggest that time is better spent solidifying technical content for proposals.

And everyone needs to decide the full issue about how implementations are expected to migrate.  Will 1.3 eliminate the CT, such as it is, in ODF 1.0/1.1/1.2 or will it build repairs on it as well as it can and leave dramatic changes for ODF 2.0?  How do implementations that confirm workability of revisions to CT in 1.3 Committee Drafts work in?  These are serious pragmatic issues.

That's a policy question that needs to be dealt with and that one would then reconcile proposals within.

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: office-collab@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:office-collab@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Svante Schubert
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 12:08
To: office-collab@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [office-collab] Straw Poll re delay to consensus report to include MCT

With all due respect if this SC would be part of a profit (or at least result) oriented company, I fear we all have been fired a while ago.


[ ... ]