Re: [office-collab] Process question/concern

[robert_weir@us.ibm.com]

<office-collab@lists.oasis-open.org> wrote on 09/11/2012
05:09:51 PM:

> From: Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>
> To: office-collab@lists.oasis-open.org, 
> Date: 09/11/2012 05:10 PM
> Subject: [office-collab] Process question/concern
> Sent by: <office-collab@lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
> Greetings!
> 
> About to post the first CT item (I will limit myself to business days)
> but have a meta-question to think about before our next meeting.
> 
> When the TC agrees to accept a use case/requirement, shouldn't we
record 
> it in JIRA so further progress on it can be tracked by both TC members
> as well as the public?
> 
> True, email discussions can be tracked, but not well.
> 


The wiki might work well here also.  More structured
than email, but doesn't force the heavier-weight issue processing workflow
either.

-Rob


> I was prompted to ask because the first "use case" is at
least in my 
> view, a couple of related but distinct use cases. Keeping that separate
> over a review/drafting process in email is going to be difficult.
> 
> Not expecting an answer but just wanted a placeholder for this issue
on 
> our next agenda.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Hope everyone is having a great week!
> 
> Patrick
> 
> -- 
> Patrick Durusau
> patrick@durusau.net
> Former Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
> Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
> Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
> Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
> 
> Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net
> Homepage: http://www.durusau.net
> Twitter: patrickDurusau
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: office-collab-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: office-collab-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>