[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Public Comment
Comment from: martin@is-thought.co.uk Name: Martin Bryan Title: IST/41 Secretary Organization: BSI Regarding Specification: ODF Typos over and above those already identified by the editor in the first 200 pages include, but are by no means limited to: Page 32: "Table 2lists" Page 39: "it's" (should be it is in a standard) Page 126: The reference to "See section 6.7.8 for more information on how to use this attribute" should end "these attributes" Page 146: Two occurrences of text:id that have not been set using the fixed width font P181: The sentence "To be able to specify cells for such positions as well, the <table:covered-table-cell> element exists." might be better expressed as "The <table:covered-table-cell> element exists to be able to specify cells for such positions." P182: Change "cane" to "can" P201: Change "the 2nd operation" to "the second operation" to match "the first operation" NB. Not happy re the proposed change of Subentries to Sub entries on P164-5. Would be better as Sub-entries if not kept as a single word. But another proposed correction changes sub-pathes to subpaths, and you also have subtables. There needs to be a consistency as to how sub is used as a prefix. I would prefer to see it used with a hyphen between it and the following word, but would be willing to see it concatenated with the word consistenly. I do not like the idea of using sub as a word on its own, or of it being specific to certain types of entry. {More comments will follow but the wife needs me to carry the shopping now...}
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]