[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-comment] odf 1.1 dc:language value (unchanged as yet for 1.2)
2008/7/3 <robert_weir@us.ibm.com>: > OK. I see you're caught up on the word "similar". Replace it if you want > with "The manner in which the language is represented is pretty" or "The > manner in which the language is represented is wicked awesome", or > whatever you want. The fact is that statement is merely an observation > and does not state a normative provision of the standard. I don't see it as editorial quibbling. It is inexact, when it is part of a specification purporting to be a standard. Since no paragraphs are marked as normative or informative I can't see that there are any grounds for marking this paragraph out as non-normative. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]