OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: "within two months of the date of transmittal of the defect report" (the JTC1 directives)


Dear colleagues,

I am writing this mail on behalf of the Japanese mirror committee for 
SC34.  

The defect report from Japan (N942) was published as an open document 
and was distributed to "SC34 and Liaisons", which includes ODF TC. 
Patrick reported this defect report to the ODF TC 
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200801/msg00010.html)
Moreover, I reported all issues in this defect report to the ODF TC 
comment mailing list.

The JTC1 directives (http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/0856revc.htm) 
require that response to defect reports shall be prepared within two months.
Please follow the JTC1 directives in maintaining ISO/IEC 26300.

	15.4.6 Preparation of Response by the Editor's Group

	Upon receipt of a defect report from the WG Convener or
	Secretariat, each member of the editor's group shall develop a
	proposed response and send it to every other member of the
	editor's group within one and one-half months of the date of
	transmittal of the defect report by the WG Secretariat.  This
	procedure may be bypassed if the defect report can be discussed
	by the members at a convenient meeting falling within the one
	and one-half month time period.

	15.4.7 Preparation of Response by the Project Editor

	Following consideration of the proposed responses received from
	the editor's group members, the Project Editor shall prepare a
	single response and transmit it with a copy of the defect report
	to the WG Convener or Secretariat and the other editor's group
	members.  This action shall be taken within two months of the
	date of transmittal of the defect report. With the response the
	Project Editor shall also send a statement of how the response
	is to be processed.  Possible responses are: 

	?  No change required; 
	?  Editorial defect; 
	?  Technical defect. 

	If the response has resulted in the development of proposed
	material for publication, that material shall be attached separately to the 
	defect report. 

-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]