Further comment on ODF_1.0_Errata_draft_3

["MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>]

First, I am happy with the way that the errata has been 
prepared.

I will review the content, but here is a comment.

>N0492:74 “Is zero allowed as a length in Chap 10? "A (positive or
>negative) physical length" (page 691) appears to disallow zero.”
>
>Rejected, not a defect. The expression syntax referenced from this 
>definition, XSL 1.0, 5.9.11, clearly allows zero.

I would argue that this is a defect, since zero is neither postive 
nor negative.  People use the phrase "non-negative integer" precisely 
because of this reason.

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>